On Luke James, Youtube Comments, And A Sorta Generation Gap

This guy’s falsetto could calm a storm. It reminds me of Maxwell’s singing on This Woman’s Work, which is similarly immaculate. I’m not sure what makes me such a sucker for these open-hearted, true-love type jams, but I’m totally bought in, and mostly unashamed.

As a sidenote, if you peruse the comments on these two videos, it’s neat to see how they flay the persona of the singer between his voice and body. A lot of comments chat about the flawlessness of his voice, as if it’s totally distinct from the physical fact of his humanity. These also tend to identify James (and Maxwell before him) as an embodiment of what’s good about 90′s R+B, or as the saviour of a stale and flagging industry.

The other focus on his muscles, and how they look when the rain pours over them (the best comment in this vein is “I’m pregnant over dis song.”) The voice becomes secondary to the physical image seen in the video.

This cleft runs through a lot of the videos in this genre: a gap between the virtuosity of the voice, and the undeniable sex appeal of the image.

In a weird way, it also mirrors how different generations receive, process, and conceptualize music. The “voice” focussed commenters tend to be older and more nostalgic for a time when videos weren’t the main means to encounter a song. They discuss the good old days when “real” artists weren’t as polished, engineered and defined by the visual (which is probably a rosy fiction, but that’s besides the point.) Nowadays, though, the brunt of artists seem to find success on the strength of their image, with lots of younger fans hearing songs mainly in tandem with the music video. These commenters tend to discuss the “look” of the artist, and how he or she looks in comparison with others in the industry (like one commenter calling Luke James, hilariously, “black Beiber.”)

I might be overreaching on this idea, but regardless, I’m glad guys like James are stimulating conversation. It’d be dope to hear his stuff on urban radio, if only for contrast to the sad-sack Drake-isms I’m hearing so often.

A Life Of Long Thoughts: Christopher Hitchens

Christopher Hitchens just died. Part of me wants to say good riddance, because he was a stubborn, argumentative, frequently cruel and often petty man. But another part of me is really sad, because he was a man of long thoughts in a world of shorter and shorter ones, and that should be celebrated.

So what do I mean by long thoughts?

In a roundabout way, a “long thought” to me, is an extended, deep engagement with a topic. One that happens over time, that morphs and accrues, that reckons with the vastness of any particular subject. I haven’t been around long enough to have any of these, though I think I’m starting to have my own “long thought” about the brain/mind (but that’s another story.)

I guess this all sounds a little opaque, but after thinking about something for long enough, you start to hone, understand, and remember, in a way you don’t—and can’t—after just a moment thinking about it.

And Christopher Hitchens was a man who devoted his life to these long, deep engagements with weighty topics. He cultivated an attention to the particulars of a subject, put his spin on them, and was unafraid to use that perspective to provoke people into thinking more. I might not agree with his thoughts on religion, but his arguments confronted me with my own ignorance, and drove me to understand and support my views. I think a lot of people have him to thank for that.

I really don’t want to take this on a tangent, but thinking about Hitchens and this idea of short vs. long thoughts had me pretty jazzed this morning while I was walking to the subway. In a weird way, I’ve been trying to articulate this idea for a few months, and reflecting on his death got me thinking about it in a different way. So thanks again, Hitch.

It started when I was sitting to watch a TED talk, and after 2 minutes of watching, felt this a restless bubbling on the edge of my awareness. An itch I needed to scratch. I felt it again when I had slumped down on the couch with a new book, but felt like putting it down after 5 pages. Then again in conversation with a friend. I wanted to move on. I wasn’t bored, exactly, but unsettled in some way. Eventually, I caught myself on youtube, 30 seconds into a video, already trawling the related videos for more to put in my queue. I also caught myself skimming a short essay in Slate, eager to check out the next one. I was bouncing around, having very, very short thoughts, tracing the surface of topics based on titles, not content.

I realized that I was churning through all kinds of material, feeling like I was learning or experiencing something, then coming to the end without any substantive memories, ideas or knowledge. I was chasing the satisfying “pop” of instant access, but didn’t stick around for the fizz of learning.

I have no idea whether I can abstract this to a statement on general online behavior. I don’t have the data to support that, but I have a suspicion it might be something a lot of people are subconsciously training to do. They’re learning to flit, and bounce, and cultivate ten things in parallel, rather than one at a time, and deeply. They’re covering broad swathes of territory, like a surveyor in a helicopter, rather than getting that mud-in-the-treads pleasure of being on the ground, ducking branches, taking in micro-level detail. It takes a lot longer to cover a mile on foot, than in the air.

There’s a place for the kind of cool, savvy, web-surfing I’m talking about, but I wonder what it means for our ability to really learn things in a way that promotes flexibility, especially when it comes to big questions of self and society. People are chattering about the “sound-biting” of public discourse, and it seems to me that my thoughts are becoming more and more like soundbites themselves. It is my own fault. I need to make room to open up, and suspend judgment. To engage, reckon with, and research.

Hitchens might have been a bit of a bastard. I might disagree the bulk of his opinions. But if anything, he modeled a life of long thoughts. I want to do that. I want to know the surface, and know what’s beneath it. The end result is a brimming world, a world brimming with debate, opinions, and questions. To miss that would be sad, I think. I’m not saying that I’ll try to stay offline more or anything, but I think I’ll be working on focusing more, and listening harder. Whether it’s online, in conversation, or reading a book. Hopefully. We’ll see. Goodbye Hitch.

Old Spice, Twitter, Wobbly Desks and a Prediction

I received a few smart comments on my earlier post about brands and social media, and both mentioned the ubiquitous Old Spice campaign from this year. I figure that I should clarify a few of my earlier thoughts, and maybe outline why I think the Old Spice campaign is one of the exceptions to the rule when it comes to social media.

First off, the Old Spice campaign was obviously incredibly popular, and garnered something like a billion impressions across all platforms. It was cheeky, unexpected and tonally odd. I especially like that they used Isaiah Mustafa to interact personally with fans over youtube and twitter in character. If you’ve got a personality like him, it makes sense to allow consumers further access to his quirks.

However, the way they used social media is pretty atypical. It wasn’t some recent hire hunched over a wobbly desk in the basement of the corporate office; it was creatives from Wieden and Kennedy sitting in a studio. The content was coming from people who understood the thrust of the creative strategy, and proceeded from that, not from a vague idea that they should be “reaching out.”

The lesson, I guess, is that some ideas (like the Old Spice one) work very well on social media, but day-to-day chatter often doesn’t. And that’s what I was saying before. Tweeting with some faceless representative of General Mills, for example, basically beckons people closer to the grave, or at least to a deep, satisfying slumber. There’s no overarching reason why they’re using that medium.

My prediction is that some agencies will eventually start offering twitter feed management (if they don’t do this already.) It would save us a lot of grief, and help preserve the fragile dignity of the poor soul who has to tweet stuff like “Hey @dattmonne, thanks for the follow” because some so-called social media expert advised them to thank every one of their new followers.  A creative spark behind the twitter feed seems much more effective.

An example that shows the potential is right here: http://fairtweets.com/ Ben and Jerry’s rigged up a weird little app that allows you to donate your spare twitter characters to a message about fair trade. Simple, brilliant, creative. So much better.

My Favorite Hip-hop Song Of 2011 Is From 1996

Yes. My favorite hip-hop song of the year was made more than a decade ago. And by a group I had never heard of before this September. It’s called Clear Blue Skies, by a little know duo called Juggaknots.

I’m also assuming that it’s journalistic poor form to pick tracks from 1996 for my 2011 best-of, but what the hell, right? I’m mostly writing for myself here, so it doesn’t really matter.

It’s hard to pin down why exactly this song is so affecting, and effective, when it lacks the high-wire lyrical prowess of Kendrick Lamar, or the elevated yet relatable straight talking of Drake, but it rises above both of those guys for me. It might have something to do with the beat, which ebbs and flows in warm crackles, snaps with muted snares, and rises angelically on the chorus. It also has to do with the clear-eyed, emotionally devastating narrative that develops as the two MC’s in Juggaknots bounce back and forth.

The story is ostensibly about a white father finding out that his son has a black girlfriend, confronting him about it, and then justifying it with a string of base prejudices. The son, it seems, never knew that his dad was a racist, and the surprise in his voice as he prods for his dad’s reasons is heartbreaking. Each point is answered with a deeper, baser generalization on the part of the father.  They stutter and interrupt each other. They argue.  Their voices rise and fill with emotion. I haven’t heard anything like it, really. And despite the explicit subject matter, it’s also about a son growing up, realizing that the man he trusted is trustworthy no more, and that his future is now severed from that of his father’s.

To a certain degree, we all experience this kind of realization, that our parents are indelibly human and flawed, not the blameless demi-gods we thought. And it’s okay. We need to step out of their shadows. Hopefully it isn’t as tragic as the story in this song, but it has to happen nonetheless. And damn, what a song this is.

Review of Bon Iver Live at Massey Hall

It goes without saying, but the Bon Iver show was amazing. He’s assembled a band of multi-instrumentalists, plopped two drummers onstage, and reworked the new album to sound window-shatteringly huge. I spent the whole time with my jaw a little slack; they’re just that tight. His saxophone player pulled off a ridiculous, world-making solo where he was circular breathing for a good 4 minutes. I have never seen that in my life.

Going into it, I couldn’t imagine a better venue than Massey Hall for the show. The acoustics are as crisp as anywhere in the city, and the stately auditorium dignifies everyone. The opening act, a petite, honey-voiced crooner named Liane La Havas played to a sparse but supportive crowd. Her tunes are a little too jazzy for my tastes, but I’d love to hear her voice over some J Dilla beats or something.

The only sore spot for me was the crowd. Massey Hall is great, and the seats are comfy, but there’s something sad about spending a whole show reclining in your seat while a full band sweats out an amazing, energetic performance onstage. I remember Jeff Tweedy saying something to that effect at Massey Hall a few years back, after the audience stood up spontaneously. Apparently a crowd at the previous Wilco show had sat for the whole thing, which pissed him off.

It was doubly sad how the crowd treated the few brave folks who displayed any physical enthusiasm for the music. I was sitting next to two bubbly girls who had flown in from Regina for the show, and when they decided to stand up during a particularly beat-driven section of Perth, a shriveled-up excuse for a human shouted “SIT DOWN” over and over until the poor girls sat down. It was horrendous. The woman who shouted didn’t even ask them nicely first. It made everyone visibly nervous to stand during the encore, me included. People like that ruin shows.

That’s basically it. Highlights were a stark, stripped down version of Re:Stacks, and a 15 minute long re-interpretation of their most maligned track Beth/Rest for the haters. It was so good. I hope someone got a solid recording of that one.

Hopefully tonight’s crowd is less paralyzed by their own fears of standing out, and will give a little back to the band. Doubt it, though. Toronto is notorious for this kind of juvenile stuff.

Drake Learned It From Z-Ro

I have no idea how this happened, but Z-Ro flew under my radar forever. I guess I had heard only a couple of his tracks, and had him pigeonholed as another cliche Southern rapper. But I finally took some time last week to immerse myself in a bunch of his albums, and I’m an instant Z-Ro evangelist. This dude is funky, generous and endlessly interesting as a character. His stuff pre-2004 isn’t so hot, but starting with The Life of Joseph W. McVey he’s basically the best.

I’ll probably write more about this later, but it’s relatively obvious that Drake learned a lot of his tricks from Z-Ro (and can’t really do it as well, or as naturally, at least.) Z-Ro shifts effortlessly between a deeply warm, grumbly rapping flow and an equally natural singing voice. He’s not a virtuoso by any means, but there’s an honest comfort in the texture of his voice. It’s human and welcoming, despite the alternately sad and angry content of his lyrics. Unfortunately for Drake, he doesn’t have the comportment or persona to sustain the level of emotion Z-Ro can, so he comes off kinda hollow or calculating when he reaches (but props for trying, I still think Take Care is dope.)

 

Social Media, and Why Brands Don’t Make Good Dates

I’ve been noticing a lot of talk over the past few years on “brand conversations,” especially as companies are chasing more and more impressions online, and trying to decode the digital realm. This might be contrarian of me, but I think this stuff is mostly wrongheaded and strategically flaccid.

If by “conversational” they mean “responsive to macro shifts in consumer taste” then yes, brands should be conversational. But honestly, I think it’s a mistake for brands to try and act like people. I don’t want to talk to Coca-Cola. I’m not really interested in tweeting back and forth with Chevrolet.

The reason why most brands work is that they are portrayals; they map things to aspire to, or spark our imaginations. They don’t sit with us and chat about our lives over a coffee date. They are not good conversation partners, because they are not people, and can’t, in the strictest sense, listen to us.

I realize that this might be going against current orthodoxy (as every brand has a facebook page and twitter presence nowadays) – but a brand is a dream we have together. We know it’s a convenient and possibly compelling fiction that other people have cooked up for us to share. Sure, we might love what a brand is “saying” in the communication strategy, but when I listen to Levis’ say “be young, be free, be American,” the last thing it wants me to do in response is send over a haiku I wrote in thrall to its brilliance. It wants me to buy jeans! It’s as simple as that.

And that’s why a brand should maintain its productive distance; because I, as a consumer, should aspire to be a part of the imagined world it’s creating. We’re all playing pretend here, but that’s part of the fun. We know Coca-Cola can’t truly “open happiness” in the way a friend can by inviting us over to drink whiskey sours, but we like to imagine it can, and the outworking of that is buying a Coke.

As much as I might get flowery in talking about branding, I try not to sever it from what it’s supposed to do, which is convince us to buy stuff (and provide the “frame” for how we see the stuff we’re buying.) I just hate watching companies let this social media craze convince them to step out of their own compelling story. Read a bunch of brand twitter pages and you’ll know what I mean. It’s like seeing a celebrity without the bright lights and make-up.

The Rise of Clams Casino

It seems like Clams Casino has become the go-to guy for weirdo beats in the past few months. I know he’s been tapped by two of rap’s rising stars (Mac Miller and A$AP Rocky) but I honestly think he’s doing his best work solo right now. His youtube account is a feast for the ears, with all sorts of awesome styles rattling around. The Lil B instrumentals sound great without Lil B drawling all over them, and this new mix Bay Side is full of bangers.

Prince, CKFG 98.7 and The Bright Promise of a Dead Medium

By the time I had really started listening to music, the radio—at least in Toronto—had become what it is now: classic rock nostalgia, repetitive mom-rock, and the blandest hip-hop possible. The moment I realized that true music exploration and discovery was happening online, I was online. But—and this is a big but—there are two moments where I understood the true potential of radio, and one of them happened last night.

The first was on a trip to England, where I heard a string of songs on the BBC that I can still remember to this day (Leonard Cohen- Suzanne, Steely Dan – Peg, Super Furry Animals – Juxtaposed With You and Prince – Raspberry Beret).  At that stage I hadn’t heard any of those songs, but  it seemed like all of them were meant to be played together. After one song would finish, I would frantically write the title down, and brace myself for whatever was coming next.

Last night I was driving down to the Bruce Peninsula show at Lee’s, and my Ipod was out of juice, so I resigned myself to hearing whatever was on. I ended up stumbling on a new station, 98.7, called something like “CKFG: The Groove.” I heard 4 incredible songs in a row before I got downtown. By the time they dropped “Diamonds and Pearls” by Prince, I was in some kind of groove trance. And that is the bright promise of radio: when you don’t know what’s coming next you can be surprised, delighted and educated. Some people put their Itunes on shuffle for a similar purpose, but you’re still drawing from a limited pool of music you already have. I like the experience of discovery.

,
,

Centre of the Venn: K-Pop Slow Jams by Super Junior

Almost everything about this Super Junior video is outrageous and perfect. The noirish tone, the slow fades, the weird chubby guy with a bowl cut. This is what happens when K-Pop tries to do a Jaheim-style lady pleasing slow jam. And you know what, I’m definitely no purist, so this works surprisingly well. It’s definitely a bit awkward, but the hook is pleasantly rhythmic, and I giggle a little when they mix random english phrases into the song (“for ya bay-bay,” “finally you’re in my life”). When I think of upsides to globalization this makes the list.

Centre of the Venn: PM Dawn + Spandau Ballet

The world is definitely getting smaller. Scenes that once lived in separate streams now jostle on the regular. It’s a world of collaborations and mash-ups. I mean, rappers I follow on twitter regularly cross scene lines to holler at each other and jump on tracks together. It’s not just the digital proximity of the players, but the speed and volume of the incursions. It’s crazy, and I like it. But as much as I admire the oddball ambiguity of our current moment, cross-pollination and strange influence really is the story of recorded culture, probably just with the speed dialled down, and the discoveries happening in the real physical world, not our digital blender (I can imagine the PM Dawn guys finding the Spandau Ballet record in a bargain bin or something).

Chances are that I’m in the minority, but one of the peaks of collided worlds for me is definitely Set Adrift On Memory Bliss by PM Dawn, which samples Spandau Ballet. It’s two of my favorite aural universes (eighties pop and nineties r+b) drafted onto the same slice of pop music. And the video is a genuinely strange trip through the most bohemian sector of 90′s style. If I was braver man I’d definitely model my closet after these guys.

Why the Friendly Fires Should Be Very Famous

As a rule of thumb, Torontonians don’t dance at shows. I’ve been to dozens since I was 15, and the majority look like this: a few lonely people at the front who gyrate wildly, surrounded by a sea of people who either stand stock still, nod their head, or rock back and forth very slightly. This has probably changed since dubstep started taking over a lot of the clubs, but for an indie-ish show, that’s my memory.

The reason why the Friendly Fires should be very, very famous is that they turned a mid-size Toronto audience into a writhing, hooting mass of dancers. I don’t know exactly how they did that, but even I felt like I was transported into my sixteen year old body during the set. They’re groovy as hell, incredibly invested in putting on a good show, and churn out anthemic records on the regular. I mean, the lead singer was dancing in the audience (trailing a 60 foot mic cord) during the first song. It was hilarious. You should buy their newest record PALA here.